Education: Personalised Learning

Lord Adonis: My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Education and Skills (Ruth Kelly) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	I am announcing today a step change in the support that the Government are providing to promote personalised learning.
	It is this Government's central aim in education to promote excellence and equality. Providing more personalised support to children and young people, giving them strength in the basics in literacy and numeracy, stretching their aspirations, and focusing on their individual strengths, weaknesses and interests, is the key to delivering this.
	The school reforms that this Government have introduced since 1997 have achieved much, and this summer's test and exam results by pupils aged 11, 14 and 16 were the highest ever. But we remain ambitious to go much further, and in particular to close the persistent gaps in attainment between children of different ethnic groups and social classes.
	I am therefore announcing today that we intend to target £335 million, by 2007–08, specifically earmarked within the new dedicated schools grant, to improve the personalisation of learning for all students in key stage 3.
	With this resource, I expect all secondary schools to provide to pupils who need it, comprehensive and intensive catch up support in literacy and numeracy, embracing, where appropriate, one-to-one and small group tuition. Mastery of English and mathematics is the necessary foundation for all children and young people to succeed in school and beyond, and must be the first priority of everyone in the education system. Through the Government's secondary national strategy we will continue to offer guidance, teaching and learning materials of high quality and expert consultancy support to enable schools to take advantage of the new resources available.
	The great majority of children, of course, have not fallen behind: they too deserve a personalised education. I also expect this investment to improve the support for gifted and talented pupils; and, also, through the development of extended services, to help to provide access to extra support or tuition in subject areas and other activities where children and young people have a particular interest or aptitude.
	It must be for teachers and parents to decide together what will best meet a particular child's needs and potential. But, through school improvement partners and the new Ofsted inspection regime, every secondary school will be expected to demonstrate that it is planning and delivering intensive catch up support where it is needed; and tailored teaching and learning for every child.
	In recognition of the importance of personalisation for those children from deprived backgrounds, within the overall school funding settlement we will target this investment particularly towards local authorities with the largest numbers of deprived children, and will expect local authorities to ensure that they focus it, in particular, towards their most deprived schools and those facing the greatest challenges. I will announce further details of this funding later this autumn, as part of the wider schools funding announcement for 2006–08.
	For those schools with the highest numbers of pupils who have fallen behind, I will—in addition to the dedicated schools grant funding outlined above—invest a further £60 million of DfES grant funding to be shared across the primary and secondary sectors in each of 2006–07 and 2007–08. This will allow schools facing the most acute challenges to ensure, through the support and guidance of the primary and secondary national strategies, that they have the right workforce, trained and qualified to provide more effective one-to-one or small group tuition for all their lowest attaining pupils.
	Although my announcement today is focused in particular on key stage 3 children, I expect all schools—primary and secondary—increasingly to personalise teaching and learning. I will also press forward with reforms to support groups who need the most support: children who have special educational needs; looked-after children; and children from some black and minority ethnic backgrounds whose educational attainment is below national averages.
	While one-to-one and small group tuition are crucial elements in our vision for truly personalised education, they must be a supplement to—not a substitute for—high quality whole class teaching and learning. We must ensure that whole class teaching consistently meets the needs of all children within the class. This is the absolute core of providing every child and young person with a tailored education. The guidance and training opportunities I have outlined above will support teachers in all schools to provide excellent, interactive lessons which will capture the imagination of every child in the class.
	Further details of the Government's plans for personalised learning will be contained in the White Paper which I intend to publish later this month.

EU Competitiveness Council

Lord Sainsbury of Turville: My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (Alan Johnson) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	I chaired the first Competitiveness Council of the UK's EU presidency in Luxembourg on 11 October 2005. My noble friend Lord Sainsbury, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Science and Innovation, chaired the council for the research item. The UK did not make any interventions.
	Commissioner McCreevy (internal market and services) presented the results of the 2005 Internal Market Scoreboard, published in July. The council took note of the information he provided, in particular that, compared to last year, considerable progress has been achieved in transposing internal market directives into national legislation in most member states. The council adopted conclusions without debate, emphasising that this is an area that requires continued effort.
	The council took note of a presidency progress report on better regulation, which gave a brief account of ongoing work regarding the use of impact assessments in the legislative process, simplification of legislation, screening of pending legislative proposals, the Commission's pilot project on a methodology to measure administrative costs, and stakeholder consultation. Vice-President Verheugen (Commissioner for Enterprise and Industry) updated the council on the developments relating to the commission communication on Better regulation for jobs and growth in the EU adopted in March 2005. He advised that the Commission intends to withdraw 68 proposals which do not comply with Lisbon objectives, and to publish a communication on simplification by the end of October. The council will return to the subject of better regulation at its next session at the end of November.
	I chaired a policy debate on some of the key aspects of REACH, the draft chemicals regulation. There was broad support for a targeted approach to information requirements, although some member states preferred that this approach should only apply to existing substances. There was broad consensus to reduce the testing requirements for the registration of substances between 10 and 100 tonnes, while some member states were willing to consider the possibility of exposure-based waiving for this tonnage range. There was also a broad consensus towards sharing of all data and joint submission of information for registrants of the same substance, provided that further consideration is given to provisions aiming to ensure a more cost-effective system and adequate protection of confidential business information. I was encouraged by the positive response to the presidency compromise proposal, which has taken the council a step closer to achieving political agreement in November.
	We did not address any formal agenda items over lunch. However, I chaired an informal discussion on competitiveness and climate change. This proved useful as a mechanism to encourage a focus on solutions that meet both competitiveness and environmental concerns. Almost without exception, Ministers recognised action on climate change as necessary.
	There were four items under any other business in the council, on which there was no debate. Commissioner Kroes (Competition) presented the state aid action plan: Less and Better Targeted State Aid: a Roadmap for State Aid Reform 2005–2009 and a Communication on State Aid for Innovation. Vice-President Verheugen informed the council about the European Enterprise Awards Scheme, which will be launched in London on 14 November. Vice-President Verheugen, also presented a communication on industrial policy, published by the Commission on 5 October, which looks at horizontal and sectoral issues and the challenges for EU industrial competitiveness. The council intends to return to this subject for more in-depth discussion at a later date. The council took note of Vice-President Verheugen's information on the final AOB item on the Third Progress Report on Life Sciences and Biotechnology, and that the Commission intends to update the Community Strategy on Life Sciences and Biotechnology in time for the 2007 Spring European Council.
	Lord Sainsbury chaired the research item, on the EU's 7th Framework Programme (FP7) for Research and Technological Development (2007–13). Commissioner Potocnik (Commissioner for Research) represented the Commission. The Council had an orientation debate on the "capacities" and "ideas" sections of the FP7 proposal based on questions set by the presidency. The UK submitted a written response to these questions (see Annex A). The Commission has suggested several new aspects to the seventh programme: funding for basic research through a European Research Council; support for large-scale public/private partnerships to take forward industrial projects; and funding for new research infrastructures. The council recalled that FP7 should be considered alongside the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (CIP). In light of the discussions, the presidency intends to draw up a revised draft text covering the whole proposal, to serve as the basis for finalising a "partial" general approach to FP7 at the council in November. This should leave open the opportunity to adjust agreed parts of the proposal, should that be necessary in the light of negotiation of the financial perspective for 2007–13.
	The council adopted at first reading (without discussion) a directive aimed at improving safety of pedestrians by laying down technical requirements on frontal protection systems in motor vehicles. The directive amends directive 70/156/EEC. The council also agreed without discussion a common approach concerning the approval of mechanical components of combinations of vehicles and re-treaded tyres. The council adopted a set of draft decisions with a view to introduce the pan-EuroMediterranean system of cumulation of origin in agreements with third countries. In all cases, the UK voted in favour.

Legal Services: Regulatory Reform

Lord Falconer of Thoroton: On 15 December 2004, I informed the House that the Government welcomed Sir David Clementi's report on the regulation of legal services in England and Wales and broadly accepted his main recommendations.
	Today I am pleased to be placing in the Libraries of both Houses a White Paper setting out the Government's proposals for the regulatory reform of legal services in England and Wales. Our proposals are consumer focused and are the result of discussion with key stakeholders, and in particular consumer groups. I am especially grateful to representatives of Citizens Advice, the Equal Opportunities Commission, the Federation of Small Businesses, the National Consumer Council, and Which? that comprise the consumer advisory panel which I established in March to advise the department in developing our proposals for reform.
	The Government are committed to putting in place a regulatory framework that puts the interests of the consumer first—a framework that will encourage more competition, innovation and transparency in the provision of legal services, but also one which will safeguard the independence and reputation of the legal professions.
	The White Paper sets out the detail of our proposals. These include a legal services board, an office for legal complaints and the facilitation of alternative business structures for the delivery of legal services. It also provides for all partners in the regulatory framework to have statutory objectives and principles.
	We will remove the existing "maze" of oversight regulators by establishing a single, independent and powerful oversight regulator, the legal services board. The board will authorise new front line regulators provided they meet its regulatory standards, including a requirement for the separation of their regulatory and representative functions.
	Appointments to the legal services board will be made on merit by the Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs. Non-lawyers will be in the majority.
	The legal services board will be required to establish and maintain a consumer panel to ensure that consumers' views are heard. Appointments to the panel will be on merit, and in accordance with the rules of the Office of the Commissioner for Public Appointments.
	We will also build consumer confidence in the handling of complaints about lawyers by creating a new and independent office for legal complaints. This office will provide a single point of entry for all consumer complaints. It will be chaired by a non-lawyer, with non-lawyers in the majority. The office will provide quick and fair redress to consumers in all circumstances. It will be independent in the handling of complaints and will ensure a consistency of approach. The office will also refer any potential issues of misconduct to the front line regulator concerned for disciplinary action, monitoring the decisions made.
	The Government also propose the facilitation of alternative business structures that may be used to deliver legal and certain other services. These new structures will enable different kinds of lawyers, and lawyers and non-lawyers, to work together on an equal footing. They will permit external investment. Through access to low cost capital and new skills these reforms will foster greater competition and innovation and enable providers better to respond to the demands of consumers. In this new environment consumer protection will be paramount and our proposals provide a range of important safeguards that will ensure the interests of the consumer are properly protected.
	This White Paper confirms the Government's intention to put consumers at the heart of the delivery of legal services. In the months to come we will continue to work closely with consumers, the legal professions and other stakeholders to ensure that this becomes a reality.

Military Low-flying Aircraft

Lord Drayson: My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Defence (Don Touhig) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	In October 2004 the inquest was held into the tragic death of Mrs Heather Bell, who died in June 2003 when she was thrown from her horse which had been startled by a low-flying Chinook helicopter. Following the inquest, the coroner wrote to the Ministry of Defence in November 2004 under Rule 43 of the coroners' rules, with recommendations of actions to be taken to reduce the possibility of such an accident happening again. On receipt of the letter a comprehensive review was begun into the conduct of low-flying training in helicopters.
	The conclusions of the review were published in a report on 14 September 2005. While it has not been possible to accept all of the recommendations, the Ministry of Defence has responded positively and constructively. Consequently, major changes have been introduced in the way in which low-flying training by military helicopters is administered which will improve the information available to the public about this essential training activity through the MoD freephone advisory service. In addition, the Ministry of Defence has launched a joint safety campaign with the British Horse Society offering practical advice to horse riders.
	I have placed the report of the review in the Library of the House.

Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements: Annual Reports

Baroness Scotland of Asthal: My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department (Fiona Mactaggart) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	I am today announcing the publication of the fourth annual Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) reports. I have arranged for copies to be placed in the House Libraries.
	The MAPPA arrangements, lead by probation, police and the prison services are making a positive contribution to improving the safety of communities across England and Wales. By establishing these arrangements to assess and manage the risk posed by sexual and violent offenders these agencies are helping to ensure that fewer people are re-victimised. Violence and sexual abuse are unacceptable wherever they occur and it is evident through these reports that such offenders are identified and better managed than ever before.
	Although the number of offenders within the MAPPA remit continues to increase, we are addressing these additional demands and strengthening the local partnership and active risk management between other social care agencies including health, social services and housing.
	In the 12 months covered by the report every area has recruited or is recruiting two lay people, appointed by the Secretary of State, to assist the MAPPA process and to improve public communication. This is vital in informing communities about these arrangements and will enhance public confidence in the actions agencies are taking.

Poverty and Social Exclusion

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath: My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (David Blunkett) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	Today I have published Opportunity for all—Seventh Annual Report 2005 (Cm 6673). The report sets out our strategy for tackling poverty and social exclusion, and reports on the indicators used to monitor progress. The report has been placed in the Library.
	We are committed to achieving a fairer, more inclusive society where nobody is held back by disadvantage or lack of opportunity. I am pleased to report significant and sustained progress has been made on a range of our indicators. Forty-one of our 60 indicators now show an improving trend, compared with 35 last year. On some other indicators the data is not sufficiently robust to be able to determine trends.
	Overall there are now 2 million fewer children and 2 million fewer pensioners living in absolute poverty since 1997, and there are 2.3 million more people in work, with unemployment the lowest for 30 years. And those in deprived communities have seen improvements in employment, education and housing.
	In this year's Opportunity for All, there are two new chapters; one on women and one on Europe.
	The women's chapter highlights the improvements we have made in areas such as increased employment and flexible working, and increased maternity leave and child care provision, whilst setting out our current cross-governmental programme of action to address issues which directly affect and disadvantage women.
	The European chapter focuses on the challenges we face from rapid social and economic change. Reforming the social dimension is essential if we are to deliver our shared goals of social justice and inclusion in this expanded global market.
	Undoubtedly there is more to do. Poverty and social exclusion are deep-rooted problems that have built up over many years.
	Tackling the root causes of poverty, as well as ameliorating it, takes time as well as commitment and investment. It also requires a partnership across all sectors of society which recognises that rights and responsibilities go hand in hand. However, this report shows that we are now starting to see real signs of equally deep-rooted and lasting change that will help individuals and communities take control of their lives and break the intergenerational cycle of poverty and deprivation.